[Terrapreta] Charcoal, Earthworms and Switchgrass
Tom Miles
tmiles at trmiles.com
Fri Apr 13 18:35:52 CDT 2007
Richard showed us a little chardust in his Charcoal Farming photos.
http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/haardcharcoal
One solution to the dust problem is a combination of the charcoal with
composted manure like the product that John Flottvik is developing.
http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/jfbiocarbon
I would think that the combination of the moist compost with the charcoal
would make it easier to spread and less dusty. Not to mention the other
benefits from combining the two.
Tom Miles
From: terrapreta-bounces at bioenergylists.org
[mailto:terrapreta-bounces at bioenergylists.org] On Behalf Of Sean K. Barry
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 2:48 PM
To: terrapreta at bioenergylists.org; Larry Williams
Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] Charcoal, Earthworms and Switchgrass
Hello everyone,
Charcoal is NOT soluble. It is often so porous, that when it's dry it has a
specific gravity below 1.00 (density lower than water), so it floats until
it becomes saturated. If it is merely applied on top of the soil, I don't
think rainfall or snow will work it into to soil. It is more likely to blow
away or wash away. Water may bind it together, but only as long as it is
wet. Dry, charcoal will be dust or small particles again and may wash or
blow away again. If charcoal is made with chunks or chips of wood, it
starts out as larger particles/chunks. With more handling, it breaks apart.
Realistically, I think that to hold charcoal "in" soil, will require that it
is incorporated (cultivated in). It only needs to be done once, though.
Charcoal "in" the soil may be a benefit because it likely will not compact
when wet as it did before. Since charcoal is hydrophilic, it attracts water
and remains wet, retaining more water in what were formerly drier soils.
Inside the soil and near the root zone, charcoal will provide its greatest
benefits to the plants growing in the soil. Charcoal provides a habitat for
soil microorganisms (full of many protective holes and channels, laots of
water around too). The soil microorganisms support plant growth by
providing the mechanisms which make soluble nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe,
etc.) available to the roots of the growing plants. When charcoal enhances
the health of the soil microorganisms, then plant growth is subsequently
enhanced. This is why "Terra Preta" improves over time.
Virgin charcoal starts out more sterile, containing less nutrients (this
depends in part on volatile matter content). As the microbes populate the
charcoal in the soil, it is the biological structures of the microbes that
binds nutrients "into" and "onto" the charcoal particles in the soil.
Charcoal can trap nutrient ions temporarily, but the plant nutrients are
water soluble and water will eventually carry the nutrients either away
(leaching) or into the roots of plants (fertilizing). It takes molecular
binding of the nutrients atoms into the biological structures of the
microorganisms within the charcoal to "hold" nutrients "in" the charcoal.
When the microbes die, water will re-dissolve the nutrients that are still
there and the roots systems can get at them. This is how the natural
symbiotic relationship between soil microbes and rooted plants has existed
for eons. Charcoal is just a catalyst that can improve it.
In the Amazon digs on "Terra Preta" sites, charcoal can be found in "chunks"
fairly deep into the soil. These chunks were not carried down into the soil
by earthworms. It was buried into the soil by people putting more soil and
composted biomass on top of it. Charcoal was also continuously reapplied
onto the sites and further buried over time. The culture that did this
probably invested tremendous effort over time to manually manipulate the
soil like this.
Work and patience are required, I think, to "cook" up "Terra Preta".
When charcoal has been put into the soil just once and the catalytic action
begins to work, it may well relieve the requirement to put industrial
fertilizer (made from fossil fuel natural gas) onto the fields every year by
tractors run by fossil fuel (petroleum diesel and gasoline from oil). So,
even if putting charcoal "into" soil now uses some fossil fuel now, in the
long run, the field will require less fossil fuel and potentially produce
more abundance.
Regards,
Sean K. Barry
Principal Engineer/Owner
Troposphere Energy, LLC
11170 142nd St. N.
Stillwater, MN 55082
(651) 351-0711 (Home/Fax)
(651) 285-0904 (Cell)
sean.barry at juno.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Larry Williams <mailto:lwilliams at nas.com>
To: terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] Charcoal, Earthworms and Switchgrass
Tom-------It seems that jump starting the earthworm population due to
the prior herbicide usage and tillage practices might be in order.
The question is how fast would the charcoal get into the soil if the
earthworm population is reduced or minimal at best. I am not a farmer
although my background includes training in forest ecology which I
have applied to urban landscaping with good results. Some forest
ecology also applies to my gardening techniques which are different
from no till agriculture and permaculture.
I have used a 5' rototiller for years in my landscaping before I
realized that soil mixing destroys soil structure. I really didn't
understand what the structure of soil was. Soil structure, as I know
it, is a myriad of structured pathways and play pens whether created
by roots, critters, vermin or different combinations of these
activities. Ecological diversity teaches me a lot of lessons. I now
believe that rototilling would be alright for crop roots provide rain
didn't settle the soil, i.e. compact it to a greater or lesser degree
depending on the puddling of water. The plow pan is another lessen in
compaction that limit root growth needed for some plants.
Just as a point of reference, a permaculturist that gardens near me
can easily put his hand up to his mid-palm into his garden site. I
was impressed. I use a shovel to much to be able to accomplish the
same in my garden site although I lightly layer with a variety of
organics continuously throughout the year to encourage biological
activity in the soil. This layering following a pattern in forest
ecology.
In the fall if charcoal was spread over a test patch or a field of
switchgrass, could a disc lightly mix it into the top two 2-3 inches
without damaging the switchgrass to badly. There must be some
existing earthworms down to the microorganisms and micro fauna that
would more quickly benefit with the charcoal in the soil rather than
on the soil.
If i remember correctly, a healthy population of earthworms can move
an inch of dirt to the surface in 100 years. Just curious how to
shorten the amount of time to restore the soil's growth potential
without oil or with a minimum amount of oil. Earthworms and charcoal
(and liming?) may be part of the answer. In a different situation
fallen leaves would be another part of the answer. The near future
will be far different than what we know today-------Larry
---------------------------------
On Apr 12, 2007, at 8:38 PM, Tom Miles wrote:
> A technique suggested today by folks in the Southern Iowa is to apply
> biochar on switchgrass in the late winter and let the snow and rain
> work it
> in. Wind is clearly a problem.
>
> There was interest in the idea of using bio-char as a soil
> amendment to
> bring up the productivity of areas of poor quality, hard clay. So
> you may
> not treat the whole field but just the areas that need it. They're
> applying
> about 35-40 lbs N/acre as urea applied with the herbicides.
>
> A side comment was that the heavy use of anhydrous ammonia on these
> fields
> in earlier years of intensive corn and soybean killed off much of
> the large
> earthworm population. From what I have seen bio-char seems to be a
> good way
> of restoring the earthworm population which obviously would have
> positive
> effects on soil texture.
>
> Tom Miles
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: terrapreta-bounces at bioenergylists.org
> [mailto:terrapreta-bounces at bioenergylists.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Davis
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 4:25 PM
> To: terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
> Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] Charcoal, Earthworms and Switchgrass
>
>
> Kurt wrote:
>> Another possible way of preparing the charcoal for adding to the soil
>> might be to mix with a bit of clay and form it into little balls, by
>> agglomeration, a subject that Jeff is very familiar with from his
>> work
>> with fireballs. The biggest problem with powdered charcoal seems
>> to be
>> the messiness and easy transport on the wind. The idea of
>> agglomerating
>> it into small balls (I visualise leadshot size) is also similar to
>> the
>> seed covering ideas one finds in "The Onestraw Revolution" by
>> Fukuofa.
>
> I would use water for the charcoal binder, lot easyer than clay.
> And, yes,
> water is a binder.
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Davis
>
> Some where 20 miles south of Lake Erie, USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Terrapreta mailing list
> Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
> http://bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/
> terrapreta_bioenergylists.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Terrapreta mailing list
> Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
> http://bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/
> terrapreta_bioenergylists.org
_______________________________________________
Terrapreta mailing list
Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biochar/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/terrapreta_bioenergylists.org/attachments/20070413/594d24c6/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Terrapreta
mailing list