[Terrapreta] Terrapreta Digest, Vol 15, Issue 14
Kevin Chisholm
kchisholm at ca.inter.net
Mon Apr 7 12:22:39 CDT 2008
Dear Sean
In your opinion, are pottery shards a necessary component in "Old Terra
Preta"?
Kevin
Sean K. Barry wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I think that it is only where charcoal-in-soil was put. If it
> spreads, why hasn't it in 4500 years? How can we find individual
> sites now, closely spaced?
>
> Regards,
>
> SKB
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Greg and April <mailto:gregandapril at earthlink.net>
> *To:* terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
> <mailto:terrapreta at bioenergylists.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, April 07, 2008 11:22 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Terrapreta] Terrapreta Digest, Vol 15, Issue 14
>
> I think we do need to understand the origins of Terra Preta - at
> least in part to understand the mechanics of how it has
> become self sustaining, and wither or not the science behind it
> would be useful in other places.
>
> What clues can we find? Other than pottery shards and the
> physical / structural makeup of the char, there is not much else
> that I know of due to the nature of the area.
>
> You are correct, that studying the nature of the mined TP might
> give a few more clues.
>
>
> Why is it self sustaining? Personally I think that it's a
> matter of achieving a given nutrient density and CEC level after
> which the density of the plant life is able to keep it going.
>
> What I would like to know is it able to spread or is it just
> confined to the areas of human influence.
>
>
> Greg H.
>
>
More information about the Terrapreta
mailing list