[Terrapreta] A reward system for eliminatingand/oroffsettingfossil carbon usage
Gerald Van Koeverden
vnkvrdn at yahoo.ca
Mon Apr 14 21:58:57 CDT 2008
I didn't think that charcoal was 100% carbon...??
G.
On 14-Apr-08, at 3:49 PM, Folke Günther wrote:
> 1 kg C is 3.666666 kg CO2 If you are paid 1 SEK ($ 0.17) for a
> kilo of carbon dioxide sequestration, you should be paid 3.7 SEK
> ($0.623) for a kilo C, or $623 for a tonne.
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
>
> Folke Günther
>
> Kollegievägen 19
>
> 224 73 Lund, Sweden
>
> home/office: +46 46 14 14 29
>
> cell: 0709 710306 skype: folkegun
>
> Homepage: http://www.holon.se/folke
> blog: http://folkegunther.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> Från: Sean K. Barry [mailto:sean.barry at juno.com]
> Skickat: den 14 april 2008 20:24
> Till: 'Greg and April'; 'Terra Preta'; Folke Günther
> Ämne: Re: [Terrapreta] A reward system for eliminatingand/
> oroffsettingfossil carbon usage
>
>
>
> Hi Folke,
>
>
>
> How is 1kg @ $0.17 = 1 metric ton (1000 kilograms) @ $624? Seems
> like this number ought to be $170.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> SKB
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Folke Günther
>
> To: 'Greg and April' ; 'Terra Preta'
>
> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 3:12 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] A reward system for eliminatingand/
> oroffsettingfossil carbon usage
>
>
>
> I pointed out a method for rewarding carbon sequestration in http://
> terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/gunthercarbonsequestration032707 and
> http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/gunthercarbondecide
>
> In some counties, you have to pay for carbon dioxide emissions.
> Make it fair. Pay the sequesterer the same amount for doing the
> negative of emissions - sequestration! I you are free to emit
> whatever you want in your country; Stop that.
>
> In Sweden, you have to pay about 1 SEK ($ 0.17) for the emission
> of 1 kg carbon dioxide. 1 kg char correspond to 3.67 kg carbon
> dioxide. Which means $ 624 dollars per metric tonne of char. It is
> rather easy to grow a crop that gives you 6 tonnes of char per
> hectare, the payment for the sequestration of which (in a fair
> world) would be about $ 3700 per hectare.
>
> Make that universal, and I think you would come down to the 350 ppm
> atmospheric carbon dioxide, the concentration that Jim Hansen
> consider fairly safe, within 20 -30 years IF you can diminish
> emissions by 85% during the same time.
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
>
> Folke Günther
>
> Kollegievägen 19
>
> 224 73 Lund, Sweden
>
> home/office: +46 46 14 14 29
>
> cell: 0709 710306 skype: folkegun
>
> Homepage: http://www.holon.se/folke
> blog: http://folkegunther.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> Från: terrapreta-bounces at bioenergylists.org [mailto:terrapreta-
> bounces at bioenergylists.org] För Greg and April
> Skickat: den 14 april 2008 07:50
> Till: Terra Preta
> Ämne: Re: [Terrapreta] A reward system for eliminating and/
> oroffsettingfossil carbon usage
>
>
>
> Until people are willing to buy carbon credits for the cost of
> actually sequestering carbon - then actually sequester the carbon -
> it isn't going to happen, and it will be next to useless to try.
>
>
>
> As things stand, they are going to want to deduct the cost of
> sequester the carbon from their taxes, while actually only paying
> what it would cost to buy a carbon credit ( as it currently
> stands ), and as such it isn't going to happen, any time soon.
>
>
>
>
>
> The theory of buying carbon credits is just political flim flam
> that feels good but does nothing.
>
>
>
>
>
> As for the Kyoto Protocols, it's just a rob Peter to pay Paul
> scam. All nations ( rich and poor ) have to work on the problem
> at the same time - otherwise carbon credits just transfers the
> carbon debt ( and favors the economies of undeveloped nations ) and
> really doesn't accomplish anything.
>
>
>
> The undeveloped nations say they should have their day in the sun,
> but, where is the logic of building up a large economy based of the
> short term cheap energy of petroleum when they know that they are
> going to spend extra, in order to convert it to renewable? They
> should be thankful for having the chance to build their growing
> economy's on renewable in the first place, and learn from the
> mistakes of the "developed" nations, and not go through the
> renewable teething pains that the US is.
>
>
>
>
>
> I've said it a million times, until people are actually willing to
> pay what it cost, to sequester carbon, it's not going to be
> profitable to do so. Until it's profitable to sequester carbon,
> the only people who are going to do so, are those that have some
> moral conviction to do so, otherwise, you end up with a lot of Al
> Gore types, that do a lot of talking, but when it comes down to
> walking the walk, they are unwilling to leave their air conditioned
> homes, because it might be a little warm outside.
>
>
>
>
>
> Greg H.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Sean K. Barry
>
> To: Terra Preta ; lou gold ; Ron Larson
>
> Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 22:08
>
> Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] A reward system for eliminating and/or
> offsettingfossil carbon usage
>
>
>
> Terra Preta Members,
>
>
>
> 'A reward system for improved agricultural and forestry practices
> that sequester carbon could remove the current CO2 overshoot. With
> simultaneous policies to reduce non-CO2 greenhouse gases, it
> appears still feasible to avert catastrophic climate change.'"
>
>
>
> Stopping the use of fossil carbon fuels is undeniably the only
> course. Replacement of that energy resource is the cost. Before
> fossil fuel moguls reap those profits, milked-out of the public at
> slowly ever-increasing prices, the use of fossil carbon has to
> almost become like the use of illegal drugs. Those dealers need to
> go out of business (or adapt).
>
>
>
> My best idea on eliminating the use of fossil fuels is for the US
> government to sign the Kyoto Protocol, then pay an IRS tax
> deduction (or credit) to every US citizen and/or business who will
> buy carbon credits on the world carbon trading market.
> Conservation, better insulation, hybrid vehicles, etc. are
> necessary too, but they can only lower the rising trend lines of
> GHG concentrations temporarily, and will NEVER reduce emissions
> (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox). Homes,
> vehicles, and businesses could have their "carbon-footprint"
> audited and apply for credits up to that limit.
>
>
>
> Then, the government could reduce it's expenses by increasing the
> CAFÉ standards.
>
>
>
> What does anyone else think of this idea?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> SKB
>
>
>
> Jag använder en gratisversion av SPAMfighter för privata användare.
> 16555 spam har blivit blockerade hittills.
> Betalande användare har inte detta meddelande i sin e-post.
> Hämta gratis SPAMfighter idag!
> _______________________________________________
> Terrapreta mailing list
> Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
> http://bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/
> terrapreta_bioenergylists.org
> http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org
> http://info.bioenergylists.org
>
>
> Jag använder en gratisversion av SPAMfighter för privata användare.
> 16556 spam har blivit blockerade hittills.
> Betalande användare har inte detta meddelande i sin e-post.
> Hämta gratis SPAMfighter idag!
> _______________________________________________
> Terrapreta mailing list
> Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
> http://bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/
> terrapreta_bioenergylists.org
> http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org
> http://info.bioenergylists.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /attachments/20080414/466efddb/attachment.html
More information about the Terrapreta
mailing list