[Terrapreta] Global Warming arguments

[Michael Bailes]

I just posted this separately but it should have gone in this conversation:

Many scientists say we may only have 10 to 20 years to slow down climate
> change. Do you believe that?
> Kamen: I'm not competent to give an answer to that. The good news is,
> instead of having great debate, why don't we all just say, let's be more
> efficient, let's use less fuel and do less damage to the environment. Let's
> make it a goal that we will continue to minimize all these negative effects,
> and we all win with it.
>
http://news.cnet.com/Segway-inventor-scoots-to-bigger-matters/2008-11395_3-6140227.html

It is just That GW arguments can get bogged down with 'Denialists' Vrs
'Doomsdayists'.

There are plenty of forums to argue those cases and I wouldn't like to see
this forum/list bogged down in endless arguments one way or the other.

Arguments about the relevance and effectiveness of of TP and charcoal to GW,
yes; but not general Global Warming issues and debates.
Michael

2008/6/6 lou gold <lou.gold at gmail.com>:
> YES to all, Michael, as long as it does not preclude telling the story and
> rationalizing the technologies in ways that maximize the potential for
> capturing carbon credits by all -- including the rich and the poor, as
well
> as the believers and the unbelievers in AGW.
>
> I am quite certain that most skeptics will be happy to avail themselves of
> economic opportunities if they are positioned to do so.
>
> hugs,  lou
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Michael Bailes <michaelangelica at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Some global warming links
>> http://geology.com/news/2007/global-warming-cartoon-series-from-npr.shtml
>>
>> Should we agree to disagree about whether Global warming is a fact or
not?
>>
>> Surely just saving resources (water, fertiliser ) and increased crop
>> production is enough to be going on with?
>>
>> There are so many debates on -line about whether global warming is
>> happening or not
>> Do we need another here?
>>
>> Regardless, isn't it wise to husband/save our resources despite the
>> predictions of dire gloom?
>>
>> --
>> Michael the Archangel
>> "Politicians will never solve The Problem;
>> because they don't realise they are The Problem.".
>> -Robert ( Bob ) Parsons 1995
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Terrapreta mailing list
>> Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biochar/
>> http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org
>> http://info.bioenergylists.org
>
>
>
> --
> http://lougold.blogspot.com
> http://flickr.com/visionshare/sets
> http://youtube.com/my_videos



-- 
Michael the Archangel
"Politicians will never solve The Problem;
because they don't realise they are The Problem.".
-Robert ( Bob ) Parsons 1995
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /attachments/20080607/c92df1b7/attachment.html