[Terrapreta] 200 tons per day Dynamotive plant in Missouri
Gerald Van Koeverden
vnkvrdn at yahoo.ca
Fri Dec 7 22:43:25 EST 2007
Tom, I think you are correct. At the near-by plant, though some of
the bio-oil is sold for use in food enhancement, most is used to
drive an electrical generator to feed into the main power grid -
which buys the power for $.11/kw.
On 7-Dec-07, at 6:11 PM, Tom Miles wrote:
> Sean,
>
> The product distribution listed is typical of Dynamotive or any of
> the other pyrolysis systems. The fast pyrolysis systems tend to get
> higher yields of useful oils which is their primary product. The
> market or use is not altogether clear. Ensyn, for example, has
> built several bio oil plants that are used for making food
> flavoring, liquid smoke. They have not yet built an energy plant
> because the value of the oil is currently higher in the food
> market. They use the energy in the gas and char to heat the
> pyrolysis process. Both suppliers use the off gas, as mentioned
> below, to drive the process. The amount of char available seems to
> depend on the energy needs of downstream processing. The more heat
> required the more char would be consumed.
>
> Dynamotive’s IAI presentation suggests that in present market
> conditions the char is worth more as energy than as a carbon
> offset. So they would use it for energy rather than sell it as
> char. Having said that they are participating in a 14 ton char
> trial in Iowa so they haven’t closed off the option. I think the
> agronomic , i.e. crop and soil enhancement, value of charcoal is
> greater in the long term but I can’t prove it.
>
> You might ask why not just burn the biomass instead of making oil?
> I think the answer is that they are in the business of selling a
> bio oil technology.
>
> Tom
>
>
> From: Sean K. Barry [mailto:sean.barry at juno.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 2:32 PM
> To: 'Gerald Van Koeverden'; Tom Miles
> Cc: terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
> Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] 200 tons per day Dynamotive plant in
> Missouri
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> I know the process can be "tilted" as you describe it. What is
> DYNAMOTIVE'S plan? They claim ...
>
> "Three products are produced: BioOil (60-75% by weight), char
> (15-20% wt.) and non-condensable gases (10-20% wt.). Yields vary
> depending on the feedstock composition. BioOil and char are
> commercial products and non-condensable gases are recycled and
> supply a major part of the energy required by the process. No waste
> is produced in the Dynamotive process."
>
> So, they are turning back some of the energy content in those
> products back into the process. They also do not mention external
> inputs of energy either. I wonder what those are? There is a
> product they have, too, called intermediate Bio-oil, which has the
> char added back into the oil to increase its BTU content. The
> energy balances and energy fluxes in pyrolysis are quite complex
> and to be honest I really do not see yet how char can be made
> economically yet?
>
> Regards,
>
> SKB
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tom Miles
> To: 'Sean K. Barry' ; 'Gerald Van Koeverden'
> Cc: terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 11:48 AM
> Subject: RE: [Terrapreta] 200 tons per day Dynamotive plant in
> Missouri
>
> Sean,
>
> Another point to remember is that the process can be tilted. You
> can "burn out" the char by converting more of it to oil or gas
> depending on the moisture in the fuel and the temperature of the
> reactor. In the absence of char markets most processes plan to use
> the char as fuel to generate heat for drying the fuel or for
> reheating the media - sand, rocks, etc. - used to heat and
> pyrolyze the fuel.
>
> Tom
>
>
> From: terrapreta-bounces at bioenergylists.org [mailto:terrapreta-
> bounces at bioenergylists.org] On Behalf Of Sean K. Barry
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 5:48 PM
> To: Gerald Van Koeverden
> Cc: terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
> Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] 200 tons per day Dynamotive plant in
> Missouri
>
> Hi Gerrit,
>
> Well that's impressive. I did not think "fast-pyrolysis" was
> capable of such a high yield in charcoal. My reading on this has
> lead me to believe that it produced large gas and liquid fractions,
> but little or no charcoal. Apparently that is wrong?
>
> Regards,
>
> SKB
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gerald Van Koeverden
> To: Sean K. Barry
> Cc: terrapreta at bioenergylists.org ; Shengar at aol.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 5:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] 200 tons per day Dynamotive plant in
> Missouri
>
> Here at Dynamotive's plant in West Lorne, they get about 18% yield
> of char.
>
> On 6-Dec-07, at 12:45 PM, Sean K. Barry wrote:
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/terrapreta_bioenergylists.org/attachments/20071207/f1bb39ce/attachment.html
More information about the Terrapreta
mailing list