[Terrapreta] FIeld and Nursery Trials
Sean K. Barry
sean.barry at juno.com
Sat Nov 24 01:44:41 EST 2007
Hi Edward, Tom, Jim, et al.,
I'd say that there probably are differences in optimal levels of charcoal amendment for different crops and/or different soils.
The numbers I've seen were 3%, 6%, and 9% (weight of char/weight of soil). There are differences to in how deep the amendments are incorporated into the soil, too; top 10 cm, top 15 cm, top 2-3 meters, etc. Also, the tests, the plants, and the soils that Dr. Lehamnn, Dr Steiner, and Gerhart Bechtold, etc. were doing/using may have changed the rate of charcoal application differently than what would be required in other agricultural settings.
I think what Jim says makes some sense. Optimizing charcoal application rates for a soil specific parameter like CEC may prove more useful for agricultural purposes, than some "one-size-fits-all" methodology.
Additionally, if one considers burying charcoal in soil as a "carbon sequestration methodology", then maybe high application rates would be beneficial ( a larger carbon bank in fewer acres?). If there is a specific charcoal density that makes the soil best for agricultrual production, then that density could be maintained in the root zone (and maybe slightly below), while any larger or smaller charcoal density could be incorporated at deeper levels.
Regards,
SKB
----- Original Message -----
From: Edward Someus<mailto:edward at terrenum.net>
To: 'Sean K. Barry'<mailto:sean.barry at juno.com> ; 'terrapreta'<mailto:terrapreta at bioenergylists.org> ; 'Jim Joyner'<mailto:jimstoytn at yahoo.com> ; Tom Miles<mailto:tmiles at trmiles.com>
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] FIeld and Nursery Trials
YES, the concentration dose still seem quite high
We use two dose formulated charcoal test scenarios in our EU tests programme:
a.. LOW: 400 kg - 1250 kg/ha low dose (20 cm top soil) --- this is the prime application.
b..
c.. HIGH: 10-25 tons / ha
Sincerely yours: Edward Someus (environmental engineer)
Terra Humana Clean Tech Ltd. (ISO 9001/ISO 14001)
3R Environmental Technologies Ltd.
ADDRESS: H-1222 Budapest, Szechenyi 59, Hungary
TEL handy: +(36-20) 201 7557
TEL / FAX: +(36-1) 424 0224
TEL SKYPE phone via computer: Edward Someus
3R TERRACARBON: http://www.terrenum.net
3R CLEANCOAL ENERGY: http://www.nvirocleantech.com<http://www.nvirocleantech.com/>
<http://www.vertustechnologies.com/>
-------Original Message-------
From: Tom Miles<mailto:tmiles at trmiles.com>
Date: 2007.11.24. 2:52:31
To: 'Sean K. Barry'<mailto:sean.barry at juno.com>; 'terrapreta'<mailto:terrapreta at bioenergylists.org>; 'Jim Joyner'<mailto:jimstoytn at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] FIeld and Nursery Trials
Sean, Jim,
These concentrations still seem quite high compared with what we’ve seen in the Cornell/U Beyreuth research in the Amazons and elsewhere. (It’s time to go back to the papers or dial up a terra preta expert.) Given the cost of charcoal in any economy we need to determine what rates are appropriate for different crops and soils.
Tom
From: terrapreta-bounces at bioenergylists.org [mailto:terrapreta-bounces at bioenergylists.org] On Behalf Of Sean K. Barry
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 3:33 PM
To: terrapreta; Jim Joyner
Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] FIeld and Nursery Trials
Hi Jim,
No, I think you pretty much summed up what I said. Cornell's research with nitrogen fixing beans said charcoal application rates at 60g kg-1 (60 g charcoal per kilogram of soil, ~6%) in the top 15 cm of soil. That worked out to around 100 tons/acre. They were trying to optimize nitrogen fixing capability along with biomass yield in the bean plants. I'm not sure that optimizing CEC would even require the same charecooal levels in that soil, let alone any other soils types.
As you said, it was in an Amazon climate, with Oxisol soils (nearly sterile, heavy, acidic, clay type soils). I did comment, too, that at $200/ton, 100 tons/acre would be an exorbitant cost, if it were paid all in one year. What the hell. I think $2000 for 10 tons/acre.
So lower application rates could delay the short term costs. They may even show some effectiveness.
Regards,
SKB
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Joyner<mailto:jimstoytn at yahoo.com>
To: terrapreta<mailto:terrapreta at bioenergylists.org>
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] FIeld and Nursery Trials
Thanks Tom.
Seems strange that Fourth Corner Nursery doesn't know how much charcoal they applied . . . maybe they don't want to tell anyone?
A discussion of how the appropriate application rate is determined would be welcome.
I came up with a figure of about 40 to 50 tons per acre trying to optimize the CEC of my own land (making several assumptions), applying it only to the top 6 inches. (Someplace I have an email from Kevin with a figure that was similar or slightly higher). The biggest assumption I made was that charcoal would measure out similar to stable humus carbon in the soil. I've seen this done with soft coal (Personally, I'm not a fan of soft coal). I would also likely need to apply some calcium (lime) but I would not do so until I gave it a full season to resettle it's own biological structure.
In a sense this already takes into consideration the climate, use and structure of soil because it is based the knowledge of the soil in question, i.e., I know what kind of response I would get, what my soil is capable of and where the returns diminish in terms of CEC. I can't find that anyone seems to care about the particular soil structure or its climate -- which to me, makes all the difference in the world!. If I moved my soil to the Amazon, I would needs much more; in Minnesota, less. But I would only know after looking at actual responses in those climes.
But Sean, I think, said he thought 100 tons/acre would be better -- applied over many years, presumably to buffer the cash outlay bite. I don't think he said how he arrived at that figure, unless he was using Cornell's numbers in the tropics -- which I doubt is a good yardstick for temperate soils. (Sean, please correct me if I'm wrong. I didn't mean to put words into your mouth, there's just much of what you said, I don't get when it comes to the soil)
Jim
----- Original Message ----
From: Tom Miles <tmiles at trmiles.com>
Jim,
Itʼs not always very clear. A discussion of how the appropriate application rate is determined would be welcome.
The applications appear to be from 5-10 tones/ha or about 2.2-4.4 tons per acre. The highest is probably equal to 3% C in the top 10 cm (4 in) of soil.
1 mt = 1.102311 short tons; 1 ha=2.471044 acres; 1 mt/ha = 0.446091 t/a.
I used 5-10 t/ha to calculate some carbon sequestration rates:
http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/carbondioxide<http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/carbondioxide>
The tests in the Oil Mallee charcoal project in Australia used a rate of 6 t/ha (2.68 t/a) in a 100 mm (3.94 in) wide band, equal to a broadcast rate of 1 t/ha (.45 t/a) for a row spacing of 600 mm (23.6 in ). See http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/oilmalleeiai07<http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/oilmalleeiai07>
Tom
From: terrapreta-bounces at bioenergylists.org [mailto:terrapreta-bounces at bioenergylists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Joyner
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 8:25 AM
It may have been stated but I can't find anyplace where the amount of charcoal applied on the trial beds is reported. Anyone know?
Thanks,
Jim
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http:/www.yahoo.com/r/hs> _______________________________________________
Terrapreta mailing list
Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biochar/
http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org
http://info.bioenergylists.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/terrapreta_bioenergylists.org/attachments/20071124/1ae7d68a/attachment.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/terrapreta_bioenergylists.org/attachments/20071124/1ae7d68a/attachment.jpe
More information about the Terrapreta
mailing list