[Terrapreta] Charcoal Specification Development

Sean K. Barry sean.barry at juno.com
Mon Oct 1 20:39:08 EDT 2007


Hi Dave & Christelle,

Thanks very much for working with Christlle Braun on developing this, Dave.  I will look at it soon and let you know what I think.  What I think now, is that you two have invested a great effort to help all of us and I wanted to thank you both.

Regards,

SKB
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: code suidae<mailto:codesuidae at gmail.com> 
  To: terrapreta at bioenergylists.org<mailto:terrapreta at bioenergylists.org> 
  Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 5:23 PM
  Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] Charcoal Specification Development


  Here is first pass at a class model that describes the relationship
  between the various entities as I currently understand them.

  I tried to keep things simple by including an experiment log where
  most of the procedural details would be kept. This allows users to
  keep as little or as much data as they want without cluttering up the
  model with rarely-used properties. The same goes for the soil and char
  analysis parts; rather than try to think of all the possible
  characteristics that someone might want to collect data for, I've
  modeled it as a list of name-value pairs, with a free-form text field
  so that the user can provide details about the measurement.

  It didn't seem useful to parallel the PyrolysisMethod-PyrolysisEvent
  relationship on the cultivation side. Maybe I'm wrong about that?
  Would a generic 'method' of cultivation experiment make sense? It
  would help to standardize testing, but I'm not sure if it would end up
  being used in the same way unless it were pretty general, like 'small
  pots' 'large pots', '25 sqft plot', etc.

  http://www.codesuidae.net/misc/BioCharModel.zargo<http://www.codesuidae.net/misc/BioCharModel.zargo>

  Anyway, take a look and let me know what you think.

  Dave K

  On 9/29/07, ch braun <brauncch at gmail.com<mailto:brauncch at gmail.com>> wrote:
  > So I looked for an UML modeling tool which could be suitable for our
  > purpose, and the best solution I tried is ArgoUML:
  > http://argouml.tigris.org/<http://argouml.tigris.org/>

  -- 
  "Our ignorance is not so vast as our failure to use what we know." -
  M. King Hubbert

  _______________________________________________
  Terrapreta mailing list
  Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org<mailto:Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org>
  http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biochar/<http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biochar/>
  http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org<http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/>
  http://info.bioenergylists.org<http://info.bioenergylists.org/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/terrapreta_bioenergylists.org/attachments/20071001/c134eb55/attachment.html 


More information about the Terrapreta mailing list