[Terrapreta] CO2 in the Oceans

[gordon eliott]

dear joe ferguson,
troll is not droll.
if you do want to make ad hominem attacks on clearly well informed and
subtle gentlemen like marc de piolenc and kevin chrisholm then you are going
to be expected to put up or shut up.
 show us all how CO2 rise precedes temp rise
explain this global warming theory if absorption spectra for CO2 are clearly
saturated.
best wishes
gordon eliott


2008/6/24 joe ferguson <jferguson at nc.rr.com>:

> But the best policy, by far, is to ignore trolls.  Then we won't waste
> our time and electrons responding to them.  They're going to keep
> cropping up on this list, and short of moderating all submissions or
> outright banning them, there's not much can be done.  But please, resist
> the impulse to reply.  That's called "feeding the trolls", and it just
> encourages them and keeps their drivel alive.
>
> William Carr wrote:
> > On Jun 22, 2008, at 1:00 PM, terrapreta-request at bioenergylists.org
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hansen may indeed be a competent and sincere and well meaning
> >> Scientist. The fact remains that if it was necessary for Gore to
> >> mess with real data in order to arrive at the conclusion he wants,
> >> if Hansen arrived at the same conclusion using different data, then
> >> they are both wrong.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > Non-Sequiter.    Independent processes leading to common results does
> > not imply a false output just because you disagree.
> >
> > If I use the ancient Shadow-stick method to measure the circumference
> > of the Earth and compute it at 24,900 miles, and my neighbor uses a
> > flawed method involving tea leaves, duct tape, and a goose, then
> > fudges the result and comes up with 24,900 miles, then we are NOT both
> > wrong.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ah-Hem.
> >
> >
> > I have a radical suggestion.   This idea may take some by surprise,
> > and may even seem a bit shocking.
> >
> >
> > How's about we respect the expertise of those who have studied and
> > made science their profession ?
> >
> >
> > In other words, if you DO have a degree in Geophysics, Statistics,
> > Climatology, or whatever, I would be fascinated to hear your views on
> > this subject.
> >
> >
> > If, on the other hand, you are merely repeating, ad nauseam, your
> > political party's talking points, and you are in fact, not a scientist
> > ---  perhaps you don't have the credibility required to make a
> > positive contribution to this discussion.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you for your attention.   We now return to our regularly
> > scheduled discussion of Terra Preta, already in progress....
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Terrapreta mailing list
> > Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biochar/
> > http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org
> > http://info.bioenergylists.org
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Terrapreta mailing list
> Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biochar/
> http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org
> http://info.bioenergylists.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /attachments/20080625/ccf7c831/attachment.html