[Terrapreta] Press release: limitations on charcoal as a carbon sink

Sean K. Barry sean.barry at juno.com
Sat May 3 15:08:09 CDT 2008


Hi Lauren,

This is clearly so much bullshit.  If one hectare of soil contains 5 tons of organic carbon and you put 10 or 15 tons of charcoal carbon onto that hectare of soil, then the microbes populations that have received enhanced growth may expire ALL of that organic carbon and still the soil will contain more carbon than it did before.  The microbes will not cause the charcoal carbon to be released.  The cellular strucures of the microbes themselves will contain some of that carbon (unless they are ghost microbes).

There is no way that adding charcoal to soil will make the microbes in that soil expire more carbon than was there originally Plus all of the charcoal carbon.

Regards,

SKB
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Laurens Rademakers<mailto:lrademakers at biopact.com> 
  To: terra pretta group<mailto:Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org> 
  Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 8:19 AM
  Subject: [Terrapreta] Press release: limitations on charcoal as a carbon sink


  Here is the press release about the study that appeared in Science:

  http://www.slu.se/?ID=704&Nyheter_id=8497<http://www.slu.se/?ID=704&Nyheter_id=8497>

  =========================================================

  Limitations of charcoal as an effective carbon sink
  Fire-derived charcoal is thought to be an important carbon sink. However, a SLU paper in Science shows that charcoal promotes soil microbes and causes a large loss of soil carbon.

  There has been greatly increasing attention given to the potential of 'biochar', or charcoal made from biological tissues (e.g., wood) to serve as a long term sink of carbon in the soil. This is because charcoal is carbon-rich and breaks down extremely slowly, persisting in soil for thousands of years. This has led to the suggestion being seriously considered by policy makers worldwide that biochar could be produced in large quantities and stored in soils. This would in turn increase ecosystem carbon sequestration, and thereby counteract human induced increases in carbon-based greenhouse gases and help combat global warming. 
  However, a new study by Professors David Wardle, Marie-Charlotte Nilsson and Olle Zackrisson at SLU, the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, in Umeå, scheduled to appear in this Friday's issue of the prestigious journal Science, suggests that these supposed benefits of biochar may be somewhat overstated. In their study, charcoal was prepared and mixed with forest soil, and left in the soil in each of three contrasting forest stands in northern Sweden for ten years. 

  They found that when charcoal was mixed into humus, there was a substantial increase in soil microorganisms (bacteria and fungi). These microbes carry out decomposition of organic matter (carbon) in the soil, and consistent with this, they found that charcoal caused greatly increased losses of native soil organic matter, and soil carbon, for each of the three forest stands. Much of this lost soil carbon would be released as carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas. Therefore, while it is true that charcoal represents a long term sink of carbon because of its persistence, this effect is at least partially offset by the capacity of charcoal to greatly promote the loss of that carbon already present in the soil. 

  The study finds that the supposed benefits of biochar in increasing ecosystem carbon storage may be overstated, at least for boreal forest soils. The effect of biochar on the loss of carbon already in the soil needs to be better understood before it can be effectively applied as a tool to mitigate human-induced increases in carbon-based greenhouse gases. 

  For information: 
  Professor David Wardle, Department of forest ecology and management, SLU (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences) Umea, Sweden, telephone +46 90 786 84 71, +46 70 658 92 81. 
  E-mail: David.Wardle at svek.slu.se<mailto:David.Wardle at svek.slu.se> 

  Professor Marie-Charlotte Nilsson, Department of forest ecology and management, SLU (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences) Umea, Sweden,, telephone +46 90 786 84 40, +46 70 556 66 04. 
  E-mail: Marie-Charlotte.Nilsson at svek.slu.se<mailto:Marie-Charlotte.Nilsson at svek.slu.se> 



  Read more...
  Posted by: Sven-Olov Bylund
  Published by: Sven-Olov Bylund

  ===========================================================

  To make the idea of biochar survive, it will be important to stress that when applied in agricultural systems, the improved biomass yields as a result of biochar applications, might offset the increased emissions from the decomposition of native SOM. 

  Also, it seems like biochar will only really work in soils with low SOM contents (e.g. tropical soils).

  _______________________________________________
  Terrapreta mailing list
  Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
  http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biochar/
  http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org
  http://info.bioenergylists.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /attachments/20080503/974dd432/attachment.html 


More information about the Terrapreta mailing list