[Terrapreta] why we must relate to cap and trade

[Kevin Chisholm]

Dear Sean

Sean K. Barry wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>  
> Thinking carefully about your reply here, "Terra Preta has more going 
> for it than just another carbon sink, ...".   I now say Show Me!
> I have NO ARGUMENT there.  I know you are right in this statement.  
> Unending discussion about how to make the "perfect" charcoal for Terra 
> Preta soil formation, and how make it and use it only if in an 
> entirely economical way from the get go, could well remain merely 
> discussions well past the time that carbon sinks would do any good.  
> Indecison and inaction are the enemies.
Jim, and some others (sadly, all too few) are "men of action" and they 
already have their charcoal "in the ground." I have some of my required 
charcoal made, but will be making some more, sufficient for my test plots.

Will you be putting in a charcoal test plot to help with data generation 
for Christelle? If so, could you please describe your proposed test plan?

Best wishes,

Kevin
>  
> Regards,
>  
> SKB
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* Greg and April <mailto:gregandapril at earthlink.net>
>     *To:* Sean K. Barry <mailto:sean.barry at juno.com> ; lou gold
>     <mailto:lou.gold at gmail.com> ; Kevin Chisholm
>     <mailto:kchisholm at ca.inter.net>
>     *Cc:* Terrapreta <mailto:Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org>
>     *Sent:* Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:29 AM
>     *Subject:* Re: [Terrapreta] why we must relate to cap and trade
>
>     Sean,
>      
>     The reason hardly anyone responded is because not everyone
>     believes as you do, and even those that do, they probably didn't
>     want to get into another time wasting argument.
>      
>     Terra Preta has more going for it than just another carbon sink,
>     and I sure that most of us would rather spend our time on all it's
>     aspects than get into another " Is AGW real or not " debate.
>      
>     Greg H.
>      
>
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         *From:* Sean K. Barry <mailto:sean.barry at juno.com>
>         *To:* lou gold <mailto:lou.gold at gmail.com> ; Kevin Chisholm
>         <mailto:kchisholm at ca.inter.net>
>         *Cc:* Terrapreta <mailto:Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org>
>         *Sent:* Wednesday, May 14, 2008 22:42
>         *Subject:* Re: [Terrapreta] why we must relate to cap and trade
>
>         SNIP
>          
>         Folke Gunthur sent an E-MAIL posting to this list last night
>         with the subject line ...
>          
>         *Re: [Terrapreta] Atmospheric CO2 Hits 387ppm*
>          
>         I posted a response to this list about Folke's posting,
>         pointing out the implications of this rather alarming
>         development in the observational data.
>         NO ONE ELSE responded and now it is just a lame, dead-end
>         thread between Folke and I, I guess ...
>          
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /attachments/20080515/1446d45b/attachment.html