[Terrapreta] A $3 trillion climate change battle

[lou gold]

Good thinking Mark.

And Biochar must be framed as more than an "advanced biofuel" -- it
must be framed as a soil enhancer that will permit sustainable biofuel
production and as carbon sequestration that will qualify for cap-and-trade
monies.

And more...

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Mark Ludlow <mark at ludlow.com> wrote:

>  $3MM? Sounds like the first order of business is to form an Association
> and hire a lobbyist! The "Farm Bill" was  over $200-billion
>
>
>
>  Not to worry! There's $300MM for advanced biofuels. It's all semantics.
> Char production is an advanced biofuel, yes?
>
>
>
> If you want govamint money learn to play the system!
>
>
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> *From:* terrapreta-bounces at bioenergylists.org [mailto:
> terrapreta-bounces at bioenergylists.org] *On Behalf Of *lou gold
> *Sent:* Saturday, May 17, 2008 1:22 AM
> *To:* Terrapreta
> *Subject:* [Terrapreta] A $3 trillion climate change battle
>
>
>
>
>
> As the US Congress passes a farm bill that allocates $3 million a year to
> bio-char research, a $3 trillion climate change battle is shaping up.
>
> At least that's what Fortune Magazine is saying...
>
>
> http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/14/news/economy/climate_change_bill.fortune/?postversion=2008051507
>



-- 
http://lougold.blogspot.com
http://flickr.com/visionshare/sets
http://youtube.com/my_videos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /attachments/20080517/1d07905d/attachment.html