[Terrapreta] Global Carbon Cycle

[Kevin Chisholm]

Dear Sean

As long as the Agricultural Benefits and Climate Change Benefits are 
able to proceed on their own merits, then I think both will win. I would 
think the Agricultural benefits will be "ready to go" before the Carbon 
Credits mechanism is in place. Carbon Credits Structuring won't hold 
back the Agricultural benefits, and indeed, with Neo-TP being proven, 
this should tend to help with Carbon Credit Program Implementation.

Best wishes,

Kevin

Sean K. Barry wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
> 
> No, I do not feel there is any fundamental problem with your assertion.
> 
> I expect the Agricultural Benefits and the Climate Change (Improvement) Benefits from using "Neo Terra Preta" land reforming will BOTH RISE, each on their own respective merits.
> 
> I think these "Benefits" will occur more nearly simultaneously from both, sooner or later (and sooner than you do).  I don't think there has to be one without the other.  Or, that either is necessarily dependent in any way on the other or any of the accruing "Benefits" of the other.  You somehow keep putting this question to me in some sort of an "exclusive-or (XOR)" paradigm, it seems; "one or the other, but not both?"  Do you see that we can agree?  ONE and BOTH can actually happen in reality, so we would both be right.
> 
> SKB
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Kevin Chisholm<mailto:kchisholm at ca.inter.net> 
>   To: Sean K. Barry<mailto:sean.barry at juno.com> 
>   Cc: Ron Larson<mailto:rongretlarson at comcast.net> ; terrapreta at bioenergylists.org<mailto:terrapreta at bioenergylists.org> ; Christoph Steiner<mailto:Christoph.Steiner at uni-bayreuth.de> 
>   Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 2:08 PM
>   Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] Global Carbon Cycle
> 
> 
>   Dear Sean
> 
>   Do you see any fundamental problem if the Agricultural Benefits and the
>   Climate Change Benefits rise or fall on their own merits?
> 
>   Kevin
> 
> 
>