[Terrapreta] range fuels
henry buehler
henry.buchler at gmail.com
Fri Nov 9 16:00:10 EST 2007
*
I started this topic some time ago. I didn't get any reply.
There was a man in China that lived in a sustainable way that should be
achived by all people on the planet. Coal was found under his house and it
was dug out causing his house to sink and colapse and he was moved to an
apartment where he no longer lives in a sustainable way.
" The syngas produced from gasifying such biomass feedstocks as corn stover,
wood by-products, and chicken litter is more difficult to clean up than
natural gas-based syngas but much easier than coal-based syngas."
*
**
*Syntroleum Announces Successful Completion of Coal-to-Liquids Demonstration
*
Syntroleum Process(R) Tested With Live Coal Synthesis Gas
TULSA, Okla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 8, 2007--Syntroleum Corporation (NASDAQ:
SYNM), a synthetic fuels technology leader, has successfully completed a
demonstration of its proprietary technology designed to convert coal into
clean synthetic liquid fuels. The test run utilized synthesis gas produced
from coal and Syntroleum's proprietary cobalt catalyst technology in the
conversion process. The 2,500-hour bench-scale test run was recently
completed at Eastman Chemical Company's Kingsport, Tennessee facility.
The demonstration proved that fuels made from coal have the same superior
synthetic Fischer-Tropsch (FT) qualities as those made from natural gas. The
demonstration also proved that Syntroleum's proprietary cobalt-based
catalyst performs robustly under real-world coal-to-liquids (CTL)
conditions, as was predicted from earlier extended life tests performed by
Syntroleum.
"We have now proven that the Syntroleum Process(R), and specifically our
cobalt catalyst, performs very well on live coal syngas in a commercial
environment," said Jack Holmes, CEO of Syntroleum. "This is a great step for
Syntroleum and we continue to believe that this technology will help pave
the way to lowering our country's reliance on foreign sources of oil, by
producing domestically sourced synthetic diesel and jet fuel. This
successful demonstration under the most challenging condition of live coal
derived syngas is also very important for the future of our Biomass to
Liquids technology. The syngas produced from gasifying such biomass
feedstocks as corn stover, wood by-products, and chicken litter is more
difficult to clean up than natural gas-based syngas but much easier than
coal-based syngas. By demonstrating the commercial viability of our cobalt
catalyst for coal, we have also addressed its suitability for any renewable
feedstock. These results in conjunction with the Air Force's successful
testing of our Fischer-Tropsch jet fuel last fall and the recent
certification of FT jet fuel for the B-52 H Stratofortress bomber create a
unique opportunity for Syntroleum to supply synthetic jet fuel from several
sources to help the Air Force meet its target of providing 50 percent of its
needs with a 50/50 synthetic blend by 2016."
As previously announced, Syntroleum has contracted to deliver 500 gallons of
renewable synthetic jet fuel for testing by the Air Force. This fuel will be
made using Syntroleum proprietary Biofining(TM) technology using a mixture
of low grade animal fats and greases as provided by Tyson Foods. Based on
preliminary testing, Syntroleum believes this renewable fuel has almost
identical properties to the natural gas-based FT jet fuel used in the
certification tests.
Syntroleum has finalized a non-confidential white paper addressing details
and results of the coal synthesis gas test. The white paper can be found on
Syntroleum's website at http://www.syntroleum.com/pr_mr_articles.aspx
On 11/9/07, Kevin Chisholm <kchisholm at ca.inter.net> wrote:
>
> Dear Duane
>
> Thanks very much for your clarifying comment.
>
> Shortly after I posted a reply to Kelpie, someone posted the Range
> Website, where the explanation of their technology was given. Sean's
> explanation is "bang on."
>
> Iogen is big on enzymatic hydrolysis, and they employed the steam
> explosion method to "open" the wood. See:
>
> http://vtwood.forprod.vt.edu/discovery/pdf/Steam%20Explosion%20Pilot%20Plant%20Sheet.pdf
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Kevin
> Duane Pendergast wrote:
> >
> > Dear Colleagues,
> >
> > I see the discussion on production of ethanol from cellulose, and
> > provide a link to Iogen Corporation here in Canada.
> >
> > http://www.iogen.ca/company/about/index.html
> >
> > It seems that Range Fuels uses a different process and the two
> > companies would be competitors.
> >
> > www.*rangefuels*.com <http://www.rangefuels.com/>
> >
> > Both of these companies use the "waste" organic material that terra
> > preta enthusiasts would like to see at least partially turned into
> > char as an important component of living soil. The ethanol producers
> > goal is to feed our cars and collect government subsides and not to
> > try and increase the planets productivity in the long term. Should
> > these techniques become established we can expect to see forests and
> > soils mined of even more of their carbon content. As I see it, the
> > organic material important to the char – organic material symbiosis
> > forming the basis of the terra preta postulate is simply burned by a
> > complex process returning the carbon content of the so called wastes
> > back to the atmosphere as CO2.
> >
> > Duane
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > *From:* terrapreta-bounces at bioenergylists.org
> > [mailto:terrapreta-bounces at bioenergylists.org] *On Behalf Of *Sean K.
> > Barry
> > *Sent:* November 8, 2007 10:41 PM
> > *To:* Kevin Chisholm; Kelpie Wilson
> > *Cc:* terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
> > *Subject:* Re: [Terrapreta] range fuels
> >
> > Hi Kelpie,
> >
> > I don't know what the catalyst metal alloy is for "synthesis gas" to
> > Ethanol-CH3CH2OH (EtOH). "Syngas" to Methanol-CH3OH is easier, I
> > guess. I don't know what the liquid fuel that Fischer and Tropsch
> > actually made was either? Even though Methanol is easier to make
> > (cheaper, simpler catalyst?) than Ethanol, I think Ethanol was chosen
> > over Methanol, however, because EtOH combines with gasoline, it runs
> > in existing internal combustion engines, it is already in the
> > refueling infrastructure, it is the preferred octane booster in
> > gasoline, it won't make you go blind by breathing it or touching it,
> > and it has a higher BTU content than Methanol.
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Terrapreta mailing list
> Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/biochar/
> http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org
> http://info.bioenergylists.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/terrapreta_bioenergylists.org/attachments/20071109/17737a15/attachment.html
More information about the Terrapreta
mailing list