[Terrapreta] The Science of Terra Preta Formation

[Greg and April]

Hmmmm.....

I would have to disagree.


With reports that char - especially a char produced at high temperatures, can be used in a battery, tells us that ion exchange can/does occur.

>From Wiki ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_preta )
Glaser et al. (1998 and 2003) and Brodowski et al. (2005) have proved that the formation of condensed aromatic structures depends on the manufacture of charcoal. It is the slow oxydation of charcoal that creates carboxylic groups; these increase the cations exchange capacity in the soil. 

It sounds like you are saying that solid material can not remain if it is acting as an ion exchange site.    If this is the case, I disagree.

I own a Roman coin, that dates from around 200 AD - and while it is heavily tarnished, and one can barely make out the design on it ( actually only parts of the design ), one can not deny that ion exchange has been occurring for hundreds of years ( almost 2000 years ), and still remain an object that can be handled and examined.

Ion exchange materials come in many different forms, some of them long lasting some of them are not ( depending on the conditions ).    Clay is a cation material ( of greater or lesser potential depending on the type ), and firing it to pottery does little to change that.

Kaolinite ( one of the materials found in the pottery shards ) has " a low cation exchange capacity (1-15 meq/100g.) " - ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaolin ).    So while the exchange potential is low, it is still there.

Other clay materials have variable amounts of cation exchange capacity - 

Montmorillonite, has quite a bit of exchange potential, and was known in  Central and South America ( we know the stuff as bentonite, and use it because of it's great cation exchange potential ) and Potassium and iron are common substitutes for it.


Still, I like you, would like to know the source of the clay used to make the pottery in the first place.


Greg H.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jim Joyner 
  To: Greg and April 
  Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 12:50
  Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] The Science of Terra Preta Formation


  Greg and April wrote:

    The fact that the materials in the pottery shards, like that of char, will also provide cation exchange, can not be totally ignored.    
  Greg, 

  There is no evidence that char does provide cation exchange, if it did, the char would disappear with the OM. In fact, there is evidence to the contrary, that it does not directly increase CEC. Char seems to provide some kind of beneficial mechanical structure to soil but is inert itself -- that is why it is still there. 

  Similarly, the fact that the shard material is still there, tells us that it, like char, is not a component of the cation exchange and, I think, does not in any way electrically or chemically interact with the soil. 

  There is one possibility: that the aquarium material of which you speak provides trace elements. Maybe the trace elements in the shards is beneficial in some small way. Plants will do better with trace elements but soils around the world have long been leached of trace elements; It's ag product is not as nutritious but it still produces and people still eat the product. It's hard to believe that these shards are in any way a necessary component of TP. 

  I don't know the source of the clay in the pottery shards but I suspect it is the same clay that is in the soil, which would mean that what ever is in the shards is already in the soil. If they made the pottery from clay that was, say, from the mountains, might be a different story.

  Jim 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /attachments/20080406/b621e2e5/attachment.html