[Terrapreta] why we must relate to cap and trade

[Sean K. Barry]

Hi Greg,

Thinking carefully about your reply here, "Terra Preta has more going for it than just another carbon sink, ...".   I now say Show Me!
I have NO ARGUMENT there.  I know you are right in this statement.  Unending discussion about how to make the "perfect" charcoal for Terra Preta soil formation, and how make it and use it only if in an entirely economical way from the get go, could well remain merely discussions well past the time that carbon sinks would do any good.  Indecison and inaction are the enemies.

Regards,

SKB
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Greg and April<mailto:gregandapril at earthlink.net> 
  To: Sean K. Barry<mailto:sean.barry at juno.com> ; lou gold<mailto:lou.gold at gmail.com> ; Kevin Chisholm<mailto:kchisholm at ca.inter.net> 
  Cc: Terrapreta<mailto:Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org> 
  Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:29 AM
  Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] why we must relate to cap and trade


  Sean,

  The reason hardly anyone responded is because not everyone believes as you do, and even those that do, they probably didn't want to get into another time wasting argument.

  Terra Preta has more going for it than just another carbon sink, and I sure that most of us would rather spend our time on all it's aspects than get into another " Is AGW real or not " debate.

  Greg H.

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Sean K. Barry<mailto:sean.barry at juno.com> 
    To: lou gold<mailto:lou.gold at gmail.com> ; Kevin Chisholm<mailto:kchisholm at ca.inter.net> 
    Cc: Terrapreta<mailto:Terrapreta at bioenergylists.org> 
    Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 22:42
    Subject: Re: [Terrapreta] why we must relate to cap and trade


    SNIP

    Folke Gunthur sent an E-MAIL posting to this list last night with the subject line ...

    Re: [Terrapreta] Atmospheric CO2 Hits 387ppm

    I posted a response to this list about Folke's posting, pointing out the implications of this rather alarming development in the observational data.
    NO ONE ELSE responded and now it is just a lame, dead-end thread between Folke and I, I guess ...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /attachments/20080515/d56d2b89/attachment.html